Moskil
New member
Hello. When creating and optimizing a site, I focus on the uniqueness and usefulness of the content.
More specifically: I take photographs of goods in an online store, process and post.
But the essence of the matter is that I am not the first to post photos, but I give them to my dealers - who, in turn, push these products across message boards, marketplaces, etc.
As a result, we have: photos of my site are indexed for a week, photos of third-party resources are indexed faster. Accordingly (as I know), plus the uniqueness goes to third-party resources.
Question: if I post an optimized (compressed by weight) image in the original extension of 4000x3000 px on the site, and the images that are already on the Internet (described above) have a smaller extension. After indexing - does my image have 100% uniqueness and does it have an advantage over others in terms of uniqueness?
More specifically: I take photographs of goods in an online store, process and post.
But the essence of the matter is that I am not the first to post photos, but I give them to my dealers - who, in turn, push these products across message boards, marketplaces, etc.
As a result, we have: photos of my site are indexed for a week, photos of third-party resources are indexed faster. Accordingly (as I know), plus the uniqueness goes to third-party resources.
Question: if I post an optimized (compressed by weight) image in the original extension of 4000x3000 px on the site, and the images that are already on the Internet (described above) have a smaller extension. After indexing - does my image have 100% uniqueness and does it have an advantage over others in terms of uniqueness?
